Meaning & Analysis
Nurses or caretakers are suspected of keeping more for themselves than they give to the children under their care—feeding themselves generously while rationing the child’s portion.
Insights
Self-Interest in Service
The proverb implies that those in caregiving or subordinate roles may exploit their position for personal gain, often at the expense of those they are meant to serve.
Abuse of Trust
Highlights the risk of entrusting the vulnerable (like children) to others, who may misuse the trust or resources given to them for their own benefit.
Disguised Greed
Suggests that selfishness can hide behind roles of nurture and care, where appearances of service mask subtle exploitation or indulgence.
Historical Household Dynamics
In early modern households, wet-nurses and caretakers were often from lower social classes. This proverb reflects upper-class anxieties about delegation—particularly in matters of child-rearing—where moral suspicion shadowed physical dependency.
Economic Allegory
Beyond childcare, the proverb functions as a broader allegory for mismanagement—where stewards, officials, or intermediaries take a larger share than those they represent or are charged to serve.
Gender and Class Tension
The figure of the nurse, a working-class woman in a domestic setting, becomes a vessel for class-based distrust, illustrating tensions between maternal ideals and economic realities.
Rhetorical Devices
Numerical Contrast
The vivid contrast between 'one' and 'two' starkly quantifies the inequality, turning an abstract vice (greed) into a visual and memorable image.
Irony
The caregiver—entrusted to nurture—is ironically portrayed as the primary beneficiary of the care arrangement, flipping moral expectations.
Metonymy
The 'bit' symbolizes nourishment, care, or resources more generally, extending the proverb’s application beyond literal feeding to broader forms of provision and exploitation.
Transcription
Quotations
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.