Meaning & Analysis
Money or resources that you choose not to donate to charitable or religious causes will inevitably be lost through other, unfortunate means, personified as the devil's intervention. This frames stinginess not as saving, but as a guaranteed future loss.
Insights
The Futility of Hoarding
The proverb argues against selfishly hoarding resources. It suggests that wealth not used for good (charity) is inherently unstable and will be lost through misfortune, disaster, or vice. The 'devil' symbolizes the inevitable negative consequences of greed.
Moral Accounting
It presents a form of spiritual or karmic accounting. Generosity is a 'payment' that brings blessings or stability, while withholding it creates a 'debt' that will be collected through negative events, ensuring a moral balance is maintained.
The Illusion of Control
This proverb challenges the idea that one can secure their future simply by accumulating wealth. It suggests that ultimate control is an illusion and that resources not consecrated to a higher purpose are subject to chaotic or destructive forces.
Generosity as Investment
It reframes charity as a form of spiritual investment. Giving is not a loss but a way to safeguard one's resources from the inevitable decay or misfortune that befalls wealth that is merely hoarded.
Theological Context
Rooted in a Reformation-era Christian worldview, this proverb serves as a powerful tool for encouraging tithing and charity. It frames generosity not merely as a good deed but as a spiritual necessity to ward off evil and misfortune, reflecting the period's intense focus on salvation and moral conduct.
Psychological Motivation
The proverb leverages powerful psychological motivators: fear of loss and guilt. It creates a cognitive framework where the anxiety of potential misfortune (the devil's work) can only be assuaged by the proactive, virtuous act of giving.
Pre-Modern Economics
In a pre-modern economy lacking insurance or stable banking, catastrophic loss was a constant threat. The proverb provides a supernatural explanation for this volatility, suggesting that moral action (charity) is the best form of insurance against unpredictable disasters.
Cross-Cultural Parallel
While explicitly Christian, the proverb's core logic resonates with the concept of karma. It reflects a universal belief that selfish actions attract negative consequences, while generous ones yield spiritual or material protection.
Rhetorical Devices
Personification
The proverb personifies misfortune and loss as 'the devil', transforming abstract anxieties into a tangible, malevolent agent. This makes the threat more vivid and emotionally compelling.
Antithesis
It creates a stark contrast between 'giving for God's sake' (a virtuous act of release) and the devil 'carrying another way' (a malevolent act of seizure). This sharp dichotomy emphasizes the moral stakes.
Warning Framework
The proverb is structured as a conditional warning, presenting an inevitable, negative consequence for failing to perform a specific moral duty. This gives it a prophetic and authoritative tone.
Transcription
Quotations
Remembre the common prouerbe. That thou sparest from giuinge for goddes sake shall the deuell carye another waye.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.