Sue a BEGGAR and get (catch) a louse

Meaning & Analysis

If you take a destitute person to court, you will recover nothing of value—at best, you might come away with a louse.

Insights

Futility of Redress

Pursuing formal justice against someone without resources is pointless; judgments mean little when there are no assets to seize.

Costly Justice

The legal path can cost more than it yields, warning that vindication pursued at any price may end in net loss.

Contamination Risk

Engaging closely with squalor—or with petty quarrels—can taint the pursuer; one may leave worse off, burdened by troubles they sought to avoid.

Strategic Prudence

Choose opponents and battles wisely; rational actors consider the recoverability of claims, not just their rightness.

Structural Limits

Highlights the justice system’s dependence on wealth: law delivers remedies chiefly where value exists, exposing inequities faced by and against the poor.

Historical Symbolism

Lice long signified poverty and vagrancy in early modern Europe; pairing the beggar with a louse draws on a stock image of destitution, echoing related sayings that make the louse the beggar’s companion.

Legal Economics

In debtor-focused legal regimes, judgments without assets are hollow. The proverb compresses a practical lesson in enforcement: a right without recovery is an expensive opinion.

Cross-cultural Parallels

It aligns with maxims like “You can’t get blood from a stone,” underscoring a widespread recognition that moral victory cannot conjure material returns.

Class Attitudes

The image carries a note of contempt, reducing the beggar to verminous association. It reflects historic biases that equate poverty with moral or bodily impurity.

Psychology of Revenge

Litigants driven by anger or pride often ignore cost–benefit realities. The saying cautions against affective reasoning that mistakes punishment for profit.

Modern Resonance

Today it warns creditors, landlords, and small businesses about chasing judgments against insolvent parties—where legal fees, time, and reputational wear may be the only certain outcomes.

Rhetorical Devices

Irony

One seeks gain through law but acquires a parasite instead, flipping expected reward into discomfort.

Hyperbole

Exaggerates the outcome to a louse to dramatize how thoroughly unrewarding the effort can be.

Metonymy

“Beggar” stands for the judgment-proof defendant; “louse” stands for worthless, even harmful, recompense.

Antithesis

Sets legal aspiration (compensation) against squalid result (vermin), sharpening the cautionary force.

Vivid imagery

Concrete, bodily imagery ensures memorability and immediate grasp of the proverb’s pragmatic warning.

futilitylawpovertyprudenceironystigma
Analyzed with gpt-5.0-thinking on November 14, 2025

Transcription

Quotations

1639, CL., Contemptus et vilitatis, s.v., p. 72.
1654, GAYTON, Pleas. Notes Don Quix., III iii, p. 83.
1659, HOW., Br. Prov., p. 40.

Goe to Law with a beggar, thou shalt gett a lowse.

1659, HOW., Eng. Prov., p. 2
1670, RAY, p. 60.

Who would sue a beggar, to get a louse?

1671, CL., Phras. Puer., s.v. Laws, p. 190.

(catch).

1672, WALK., 5, p. 34.

(catch).

1681, ROB., p. 229.

(catch).

1687, MIEGE, s.v. Beggar.

(catch).

1730, BAILEY, s.v. Louse.

(catch).

1732, FUL., no. 4285.

Cross References

Original Scan

Sue a BEGGAR and get (catch) a louse - a scanned entry from Tilley's 1950 Dictionary of Proverbs.
Scan courtesy of HathiTrust Digital Library.
Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.

© 2026 TilleyProverbs.com · About

Last updated: January 27, 2026