Meaning & Analysis
Kind words are like a soothing balm that comforts and heals, while harsh or evil words have a destructive effect, as if they are physically pulling a person's joints apart.
Insights
Psychological Healing vs. Trauma
Positive communication fosters emotional and psychological well-being, soothing anxieties and building self-worth. Conversely, negative language inflicts deep emotional wounds, causing distress and shattering a person's sense of inner coherence.
Social Cohesion vs. Division
Encouraging and respectful language strengthens social bonds, ensuring relationships function smoothly and harmoniously. Insults and criticism, however, create friction and conflict, capable of fracturing friendships, families, and communities.
Constructive vs. Destructive Speech
The proverb serves as a moral guide for speech, advocating for a language of empathy and support that builds people up. It warns against the destructive consequences of careless or malicious words, which can dismantle a person's spirit and reputation.
Sacred Power of Language
The term 'anoint' carries significant historical and religious weight, evoking biblical practices of consecrating kings or healing the sick with sacred oil. This elevates 'good words' from mere pleasantries to a form of blessing or spiritual remedy, suggesting they have a sacred, restorative power.
Psychosomatic Insight
The proverb's physical metaphors—'anoint' (to smooth, heal) and 'unjoint' (to dislocate, break apart)—presciently capture the psychosomatic effects of language. Modern psychology affirms that positive language can foster neurological integration and well-being, while verbal abuse can create trauma and a sense of psychological fragmentation.
Cultural View of Verbal Harm
The variations in the historical quotations ('pricke', 'kyl', 'gore') reveal a consistent cultural understanding of the visceral, wounding capacity of negative words. This underscores a deep-seated societal awareness that language is not abstract but a potent force capable of inflicting real, tangible harm.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb is structured on a stark contrast between 'Good WORDS' and 'ill' words, and their opposing actions, 'anoint' versus 'unjoint'. This direct opposition creates a memorable and powerful rhetorical balance.
Metaphor
The words 'anoint' and 'unjoint' are powerful physical metaphors. 'Anoint' suggests healing, blessing, and comfort, while 'unjoint' creates a visceral image of dislocation, pain, and destruction.
Parallelism
The parallel structure ('Good WORDS anoint us' / 'ill [words] do unjoint us') reinforces the thematic contrast and gives the proverb a rhythmic, balanced quality that enhances its memorability.
Transcription
Quotations
Good woordes do annointe, the shrewe do pricke.
Good woords annoynt a man, the yl woordes kyl a man.
Good words do annoynt, and euill disapoint.
Good words do anoint, but bad do prick.
Good words anoint, bad words gore.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.