Meaning & Analysis
The proverb literally claims that a moneylender's desire for wealth and a woman's desire (implied to be for material goods or sexual gratification, via the 'placket') are both limitless and can never be fulfilled.
Insights
Critique of Insatiable Desire
The proverb serves as a cynical commentary on the nature of human desire, suggesting that certain appetites—specifically for wealth and sensual or material gratification—are inherently boundless and lead to a state of perpetual dissatisfaction.
Social Stereotyping
It functions as a harsh social critique, equating the perceived predatory greed of usurers with a misogynistic stereotype of female insatiability. The parallel construction condemns both groups as morally corrupt and driven by uncontrollable appetites that threaten social stability.
Anxiety over Social Control
Metaphorically, the proverb expresses deep-seated societal anxieties about economic exploitation (usury) and female autonomy. It links the perceived threat of unregulated finance with the perceived threat of female desire, portraying both as destabilizing forces.
Historical Misogyny
The proverb is rooted in a long history of misogyny, where female desire was often depicted as a dangerous, chaotic force that threatened social order. The 'placket,' an opening in a woman's skirt for a pocket or access, is used as a crude metonym for female sexuality or material wants, framing it as a source of moral corruption.
Anti-Usury Sentiment
Historically, usury (lending money at exorbitant interest) was widely condemned as a sin. This proverb taps into that deep-seated sentiment, portraying moneylenders as morally bankrupt individuals whose greed is unnatural. The comparison to 'women's plackets' is intended to amplify this condemnation through association with another perceived vice.
Psychological Projection
Psychologically, the proverb employs projection, attributing societal anxieties about economic instability and uncontrolled desire onto two specific groups. By framing these appetites as 'never satisfied,' it justifies social controls over both financial practices and women's autonomy, portraying both as threats to a stable, patriarchal order.
Rhetorical Devices
Parallelism
The proverb uses a stark parallel structure, equating 'usurers' purses' and 'women's plackets.' This rhetorical device forces a direct and damning comparison, strengthening the intended critique of both.
Hyperbole
The use of 'never satisfied' is a clear hyperbole, exaggerating the appetites of both groups to emphasize their perceived moral corruption and to create a memorable, shocking statement.
Metonymy
'Purse' serves as a metonym for financial greed, while 'placket' is a crude metonym for female desire (either material or sexual). These concrete objects are used to symbolize abstract concepts, making the proverb's attack more visceral.
Transcription
Quotations
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.