Meaning & Analysis
One should not rely on what a woman says—her promises or testimony are declared untrustworthy.
Insights
Patriarchal distrust
The proverb encodes a social rule that treats women as inherently unreliable, legitimizing their exclusion from authority, testimony, and decision-making.
Control through disbelief
Withholding trust functions as a disciplinary tool: by preemptively doubting women’s words, communities curb their agency, credibility, and capacity to contest narratives.
Projection of volatility
It projects fears about changeable desire or emotion onto women, casting them as fickle while obscuring men’s own inconsistencies.
Reputational silencing
If a group’s speech is presumed false, its members must over-prove even the ordinary; the burden of proof becomes a silencing mechanism.
Misapplied prudence
A legitimate counsel—verify claims—gets universalized against a class. The proverb distorts situational caution into categorical bias.
Early modern context
In Tudor–Stuart culture, women’s legal identities were constrained by coverture; proverbs like this naturalized limited credibility, appearing in dramatists and moralists who paired women with other ‘unreliable’ things (e.g., taps, eagle’s tails).
Literary resonance
Shakespeare’s bitter line about trusting a ‘whore’s oath’ (King Lear III.vi) echoes the trope, aligning female speech with broken oaths and folding misogynist suspicion into tragic rhetoric.
Testimonial injustice
Philosophically, it exemplifies testimonial injustice: prejudicially deflating a speaker’s credibility due to identity, which corrupts knowledge-making and corrodes social trust.
Self-fulfilling harm
Systematic doubt incentivizes withdrawal or strategic ambiguity; when women’s words cannot win belief, silence or indirection may follow—then cited as proof of ‘untrustworthiness.’
Gendered double standard
Comparable male vices (boasting, perjury) rarely generate class-wide bans on trust; the proverb reveals asymmetrical moral policing linked to sexuality and status.
Counter-proverbial balance
Set against maxims that locate truth within trust and integrity in kept troth, this saying shows a culture arguing with itself; wiser practice judges credibility by character and evidence, not gender.
Rhetorical Devices
Universal negative
‘No trust’ asserts an absolute, foreclosing exceptions and amplifying prejudice through grammatical totality.
Synecdoche
‘A woman’s word’ stands for the entirety of women’s testimony, shrinking complex individuals into a single faulty token.
Alliteration
The w- echo in ‘woman’s word’ lends a catchy cadence that aids transmission of the bias.
Aphoristic compression
Brief, categorical phrasing turns a social norm into a portable ‘truth,’ easy to remember and hard to nuance.
Parallel trope (intertext)
In cognate sayings, women are grouped with unstable animals or objects; the rhetorical bundling bolsters the stereotype by association.
Transcription
Quotations
This is a true prouerbe, and no fained fable, Few womens words, be honest, constant, and stable.
There is no trusting a woman nor a tapp.
Who takes an Eagle by the tail, and a woman at her word, holds nothing.
There is no hold to be ta'ne of (no trust to be given to) a womans word.
Shakespeare Citations
He's mad that trusts in the tameness of a wolf, a horse's health [heels?], a boy's love, or a whore's oath.
Cross References
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.