Meaning & Analysis
If there is a shortage of food ('meat') for guests, the host should compensate by providing a plentiful amount of beverages ('drink').
Insights
Compensation for Deficiency
The proverb illustrates the principle of compensation, suggesting that a deficiency in one area can be balanced by an abundance in another. It speaks to the idea of making up for a shortcoming by excelling or being generous with an alternative resource.
Distraction and Appeasement
It can be interpreted as a strategy of distraction or appeasement. By supplying a more accessible or superficial pleasure ('drink'), one can divert attention from a more fundamental or substantial lack ('meat'), effectively managing dissatisfaction.
Deceptive Generosity
The proverb reflects a cynical view of generosity, where an outward display of abundance in one form (drink) can mask a calculated stinginess in another, more essential form (meat). It hints that some acts of hospitality can be deceptive.
Economics of Hospitality
Historically, 'meat' symbolized substantial wealth and hospitality, while 'drink' was a more fluid commodity. The proverb captures a practical approach to social obligations, where a host could maintain a reputation for generosity by substituting abundant drink for scarce or expensive food, reflecting the economic realities of provisioning and hosting.
Psychology of Compensation
The proverb reveals a psychological tendency to use overcompensation as a coping mechanism. When faced with a deficiency in one area, individuals or groups may redirect focus to an area of abundance to distract from the lack, maintain morale, or preserve social standing.
Pragmatic Substitution
The saying underscores a principle of resourceful substitution. It advises that when a primary need or desire cannot be met, an alternative form of satisfaction should be offered or sought, highlighting adaptability and pragmatism in managing resources and expectations.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb is built on the direct contrast between 'meat' (solid, substance, necessity) and 'drink' (liquid, pleasure, supplement), effectively highlighting the theme of substitution.
Parallelism
The balanced structure of 'What they want in...' and 'let them take in...' creates a memorable, rhythmic phrase that is easy to recall and apply.
Symbolism
'Meat' serves as a symbol for any essential or substantial provision, while 'drink' represents secondary pleasures or compensations, allowing the proverb to be applied to a wide range of situations.
Transcription
Quotations
What they wanted in meate, Rosader supplied with drinke.
Make it 4s. wine, though you bate it them in their meate. —Why so, I prethee? —Because of the old proverbe, What they want in meate, let them take out in drinke.
For this voyage he was as well stord with provisions as could well be had, but what they wanted in meate, as the old proverb saith, they might taike in drinke, for he had aborde the ship three hundreth bottles of wine.
Shakespeare Citations
What you want in meat, we'll have in drink.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.