Meaning & Analysis
Based on the biblical story in Genesis 34, this proverb literally describes a scenario where one man, Shechem, gets his desire (marrying a wife), while another man, Mifgaeus (a stand-in for the men of Shechem's city), endures the painful cost (circumcision) required to secure that marriage.
Insights
Unjust Distribution of Consequences
The proverb is a potent metaphor for any situation where one person reaps the benefits of an action while another person is forced to bear the unpleasant, painful, or costly consequences. It highlights a fundamental and unjust imbalance of outcomes.
Scapegoating and Proxy Suffering
It illustrates the concept of a scapegoat or proxy suffering, where an innocent or unrelated party is made to pay the price for the desires or transgressions of another. Mifgaeus suffers for Shechem's gain.
Deceptive Bargains
The proverb warns about deceptive bargains where the terms are skewed unfairly. It represents an agreement in which one party achieves their goal, while the other is tricked into a painful or disadvantageous commitment under false pretenses.
Severed Cause and Effect
It symbolizes a profound disconnect between action and repercussion. The person who initiates the cause (Shechem) is shielded from the effect, which is instead inflicted upon someone else, creating a moral and logical absurdity.
Biblical Allegory
The proverb's power is derived entirely from its allusion to the biblical story of Dinah in Genesis 34. Shechem's desire for Dinah leads to a deceptive pact where his people undergo circumcision, only to be slaughtered. This proverb encapsulates that narrative of treacherous agreements and displaced consequences, resonating in cultures steeped in biblical literacy.
Moral Warning
The proverb serves as a timeless warning against becoming an unwitting pawn in someone else’s bargain. It cautions individuals to scrutinize agreements to ensure they are not the 'Mifgaeus' who pays the price for another's gain, highlighting the dangers of vicarious liability and poorly negotiated commitments.
Folkloric Adaptation
The name 'Mifgaeus' is not found in the biblical text, suggesting a folk adaptation of the original story. This substitution transforms the specific men of Shechem into a universal archetype of the 'fall guy' or scapegoat, making the proverb's application broader and more adaptable to various situations of injustice.
Psychology of Injustice
Psychologically, the proverb taps into the primal human sense of fairness and outrage at injustice. It crystallizes the resentment felt when rewards and punishments are disconnected from the actions that merited them, reflecting a deep-seated need for moral and causal accountability.
Rhetorical Devices
Biblical Allusion
The proverb's entire meaning is built upon an allusion to the biblical narrative of Shechem and Dinah (Genesis 34), using the names as archetypes for the beneficiary and the sufferer.
Juxtaposition
The proverb creates a sharp, ironic contrast between a joyous outcome ('marries the wife') and a painful one ('is circumcised'), linking them with a simple 'and' to emphasize the absurdity and injustice of the situation.
Character Archetype
The names 'Sichem' and 'Mifgaeus' function as archetypes, representing the selfish opportunist and the exploited victim, respectively. This transforms a specific story into a universal parable of injustice.
Transcription
Quotations
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.