Meaning & Analysis
To receive good service, one should not employ a servant who is forced to work, nor should one hire a relative or a friend, as these arrangements are unlikely to result in satisfactory performance.
Insights
The Nature of True Loyalty
Genuine loyalty and support in any context—be it personal or professional—cannot be coerced or assumed based on pre-existing ties like family or friendship. True allegiance must be voluntary and earned, as forced commitment breeds resentment and unreliable outcomes.
Boundaries in Relationships
The proverb serves as a powerful warning against blurring the lines between personal and professional life. Mixing these spheres creates conflicting expectations and undermines the clarity and accountability necessary for effective performance, ultimately compromising the quality of the 'service' rendered.
Motivation and Performance
The quality of any outcome is directly tied to the motivation of the person performing the task. An unwilling participant lacks internal drive, while a friend or relative may feel their personal connection exempts them from rigorous standards. The proverb suggests that optimal results come from willing, accountable individuals in clearly defined roles.
Critique of Nepotism
This proverb offers a timeless critique of nepotism and coerced loyalty, arguing that employment based on personal relationships or obligation rather than merit and willingness is inherently flawed. The 17th-century quotations emphasize the practical downsides, noting that friends and kin often expect greater leniency and deliver inferior work, reflecting a deep-seated understanding of human nature within workplace hierarchies.
Psychological Dynamics
The proverb astutely identifies the psychological friction that arises from dual-role relationships. When a friend or kinsman becomes an employee, the informal, reciprocal expectations of a personal bond conflict with the formal, hierarchical demands of a professional one. This creates a psychological tension that often leads to resentment, entitlement, and ultimately, poor service.
The Professional Contract
The proverb implicitly champions the idea of a professional contract based on mutual consent and clear boundaries. By warning against employing the unwilling, friends, or family, it underscores the importance of motivation and professional distance for achieving quality outcomes. This principle remains a cornerstone of modern management theory.
Rhetorical Devices
Conditional Clause
The proverb's structure, 'Never do X... if you desire Y', presents the advice not as a moral absolute but as pragmatic, cause-and-effect wisdom, making it a powerful piece of practical guidance.
Parallelism
The listing of three distinct categories—'servant against his will', 'kinsman', and 'friend'—creates a memorable rhythmic structure (a triad) that reinforces the scope and seriousness of the advice.
Didactic Tone
The proverb adopts an authoritative and instructional tone, directly dispensing wisdom in a clear, memorable format characteristic of didactic literature.
Transcription
Quotations
A kinsman, a friend, or whom you intreate, take not to serve you, if you wil be served neatly.
A Kinsman or a Friend will look for more, and do lesse then a Servant.
Neither take too young a boy, nor kinsman, nor one that is intreated for thy servant.
Cross References
- See DÜR., II, no. 748.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.