Meaning & Analysis
The reception of a statement determines its quality. If the listener chooses to interpret words in a positive way ('well taken'), then the words are considered to have been spoken well, regardless of the speaker's original phrasing or intent.
Insights
Subjectivity of Meaning
The proverb argues that meaning is not inherent in words themselves but is created by the act of interpretation. It suggests that 'truth' and 'offense' are subjective, shaped by the listener's perspective, goodwill, or prejudice.
Power of Interpretation
It highlights the listener's active and powerful role in any communicative exchange. The proverb places the responsibility for peaceful and effective communication not on the speaker, but on the receiver's willingness to interpret charitably.
Aphorism for Social Harmony
As a social maxim, it advises that choosing to receive ambiguous statements generously is the key to maintaining social harmony and avoiding unnecessary conflict. It prioritizes relationship stability over literal accuracy.
Intent vs. Impact
The proverb prioritizes the ultimate impact of a statement over the speaker's original intent. If the outcome is positive because the listener took it well, any potential ill-intent from the speaker is rendered irrelevant.
Psychological Insight
This proverb reflects a psychological truth about communication: a listener's pre-existing disposition and biases heavily influence their interpretation. It champions the 'principle of charity,' where assuming good intent in others' words can preemptively neutralize potential conflict, making the listener's mindset the key determinant of social harmony.
Social De-escalation
In the honor-based societies of the 16th and 17th centuries, where the provided quotations originate, a misconstrued word could lead to serious social or physical conflict. This proverb serves as a practical tool for de-escalation, empowering the listener to defuse tension by choosing a generous interpretation.
Ethical Ambiguity
The proverb's logic contrasts sharply with modern legal and ethical standards, where the impact of speech is often judged by a 'reasonable person' standard. By prioritizing the listener's subjective reception, it could be used to excuse genuinely harmful or negligent language, highlighting a shift in communicative responsibility over time.
Rhetorical Devices
Parallelism
The proverb is built on a symmetrical and balanced structure ('well spoken'...'well taken'), creating a memorable and persuasive logical equivalence between the two clauses.
Tautology
The statement has a circular quality, defining good speech by its good reception and vice-versa. This is not a logical flaw but a rhetorical device that reinforces the inseparable connection between speaking and listening.
Passive Voice
The use of the passive voice ('is well spoken', 'is well taken') elevates the saying from personal advice to a universal, impersonal principle, making it sound like an objective truth about the nature of communication.
Transcription
Quotations
Ther is nothing ill spoken but that is evil taken.
Things are well spoken, if they be well taken.
Whatsoever they speake, is well taken; and whatsoever is well taken, is well-spoken.
(There is nothing ill said).
Words well spoken because well taken.
Cross References
Related Proverbs
Original Scan


Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.