Meaning & Analysis
As wealth increases, so does the honor or public respect a person receives.
Insights
Wealth–Esteem Coupling
Treats honor as a social shadow cast by money: riches purchase visibility, deference, and ceremonial precedence that are mistaken for moral worth.
Patronage Logic
In gift-and-feast economies, honor accrues to those who can fund hospitality, retinues, and alms; generosity financed by wealth manufactures reputation.
Status Heuristic
Communities often shortcut merit judging by affluence; luxury signals competence and dominance, so observers confer ‘honor’ as a cognitive economizer.
Cynical Realism
Reads ‘honor’ as a euphemism for fear and dependency: people bow to wealth not for virtue’s sake but because money commands power and punishment.
Class Reinforcement
By equating riches with honor, the proverb naturalizes hierarchy, justifying inequality as a moral gradient rather than a material one.
Early Modern Marketplace
Heywood’s quip—‘They are noble that have nobles’—puns coin into rank, reflecting a culture where cash flow underwrote pageantry and precedence; money literally staged ‘honor.’
Honor vs. Virtue
The saying collides with humanist maxims that make honor the reward of virtue; it exposes a social slippage whereby price becomes proxy for praiseworthiness.
Conspicuous Display
Veblen’s insight is prefigured here: lavish spending signals status; honor is the applause for waste made visible—banquets, liveries, monuments.
Motive Crowding
When honor tracks wealth, institutions drift toward pay-to-prestige systems (vendible offices, sponsorships), eroding trust that esteem corresponds to service.
Psychology of Deference
Humans orient to resource holders; wealth cues competence and authority (often falsely), eliciting deference that then loops back to confirm the wealthy as ‘honorable.’
Rhetorical Devices
Paratactic Maxim
A bare A→B formulation (‘the more… the more…’) gives the line the air of a social law, smooth and unquestioned.
Irony
Equates moral honor with money—an implicit critique that what passes for ‘honor’ may be mere valuation in coin.
Antithesis (implied)
By implying that poverty reduces honor, the proverb sets an unspoken contrast that sharpens its class bias.
Metonymy
‘Honor’ stands for deference rituals—titles, bows, front seats—while ‘rich’ stands for control of resources; abstract forces condensed into social tokens.
Aphoristic Compression
Few words, sweeping claim—its memorability helps normalize a controversial equivalence.
Transcription
Quotations
They are noble that have nobles [i.e., money].
He that is rich is reuerenced.
Cross References
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.