Meaning & Analysis
Initiating a single lawsuit frequently leads to a cascade of numerous additional legal actions, such as counter-suits and appeals, rather than providing a simple resolution.
Insights
Escalation of Conflict
The proverb is a metaphor for the self-perpetuating nature of conflict. Once a dispute is formalized or escalated, it often creates new grievances and resentments, leading to a cycle of retaliation rather than a return to peace.
Unintended Consequences
It illustrates the principle that actions, particularly aggressive or formal interventions, can have unforeseen and counterproductive results. The intended 'cure' (a lawsuit) becomes worse than the disease by generating more problems than it solves.
Systemic Entanglement
Symbolically, the proverb critiques any complex, adversarial system—be it legal, bureaucratic, or political. Engaging with such a system on its own terms can lead to entanglement, where the process itself creates more issues to be processed, trapping participants in an exhausting loop.
Historical Legal Frustration
Originating from a period with notoriously slow, expensive, and often corrupt legal systems, the proverb reflects deep-seated public frustration. It evokes the historical reality of litigation, famously satirized in works like Charles Dickens' *Bleak House*, where the legal process itself becomes a monstrous entity that consumes the lives and fortunes of all involved.
Psychology of Entrapment
Psychologically, the proverb highlights the concepts of entrapment and the sunk cost fallacy. Once individuals invest time, money, and emotion into a legal battle, they become increasingly committed to seeing it through, often initiating further actions to justify their initial investment, regardless of the escalating costs and diminishing returns.
Critique of Litigiousness
The proverb serves as a timeless critique of litigious societies. It warns that an over-reliance on formal, adversarial systems to resolve disputes can weaken social cohesion, replacing negotiation and compromise with a self-perpetuating cycle of accusation and counter-accusation.
Rhetorical Devices
Hyperbole
The use of 'twenty' is a hyperbolic amplification, used not as a literal number but to emphasize the dramatic and overwhelming multiplication of problems that a single lawsuit can cause. This exaggeration creates a memorable and impactful warning.
Metaphor
The verb 'breeds' is a potent metaphor, personifying the lawsuit as a living entity that reproduces uncontrollably. This imagery effectively conveys the idea of an organic, chaotic, and unstoppable growth of conflict.
Cause-and-Effect Structure
The proverb's simple cause-and-effect structure ('one suit breeds twenty') presents its conclusion as an inevitable, almost scientific, law. This rhetorical framing makes the warning feel absolute and universally true.
Transcription
Quotations
The worst of Law-suits is, that of one there grow a hundred.
*Hispan.
One Suit of Law breeds twenty.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.