One TALE is good until another be told (heard)

Meaning & Analysis

A story seems convincing until you hear a second account; judgment should be reserved until all sides are heard.

Insights

Provisional judgment

Treat first impressions as tentative; evidence has a way of rearranging itself once a missing perspective appears.

Narrative rivalry

Competing stories contend for plausibility; the newer tale can recast facts, motives, and stakes, exposing how meaning is negotiated.

Anti-gullibility

Warns against credulity and charm: eloquence or confidence in the first speaker should not substitute for corroboration.

Fair-hearing ethic

Encodes a norm of procedural justice—no verdict without hearing the other party—extending from household disputes to courts and councils.

Self-correction

Invites a habit of updating beliefs as new data arrive, modeling intellectual humility and resilience against error.

Legal maxim

The proverb is a vernacular twin of audi alteram partem (“hear the other side”), the backbone of due process and cross-examination: ex parte tales are ‘good’ only until contradicted.

Sense of “good”

Here ‘good’ means persuasive or satisfactory, not morally right—an early modern usage that underlines rhetoric’s power to feel true before it is tested.

Cognitive bias check

It counters primacy and confirmation biases: the first account anchors belief, so the saying institutionalizes a pause—reserve assent until a rival framing is heard.

Public discourse

Journalistic and scholarly norms echo it—seek corroboration, present counter-evidence—while cautioning against false balance: hearing ‘another’ means relevant, credible sides, not every spurious claim.

Literary echo

Jonson’s quip—‘A fine device!—Yes, till we hear a finer’—plays on the proverb’s elasticity: novelty can dethrone prior narratives, dramatizing the fashion of opinion.

Social peace

Practically, the maxim cools quarrels: by promising a second hearing, communities delay rash judgments that inflame conflict.

Rhetorical Devices

Antithesis

‘One tale’ versus ‘another’ frames truth-testing as a clash of accounts, sharpening the caution.

Temporal subordination

‘Until’ encodes provisionality—approval is time-limited pending further testimony.

Isocolon

Balanced clauses (‘One tale is good // until another be told’) give rhythmic symmetry that aids recall.

Archaism (subjunctive)

‘Be told’ preserves older subjunctive coloring, suiting the hypothetical, not-yet-heard counter-story.

Alliteration

‘Tale’ and ‘told’ chime, reinforcing the proverb’s focus on narration itself.

fairnessjudgmentbiasevidencerhetoricskepticism
Analyzed with gpt-5.0-thinking on November 14, 2025

Transcription

Quotations

Tush syr quoth the Marquesse, one tale is always good vntil another is heard.

1593, GREENE, Mamillia II, p. 222

(heard).

1616, DR., no. 2100

(We say commonly, one tale is good till).

1627, R. SANDERSON, Ad Magistratum i: Serm., I 260
1639, CL., p. 90

A fine device! —Yes, till we heare a finer.

1640, JONSON, Tale Tub, I i 63

(till the other be told).

1659, HOW., Eng. Prov., p. 12

One's tale is good till another's be heard.

1666, TOR., It. Prov., note 92, p. 224

(till another is told).

1670, RAY, p. 147

One tales good, till another be told; hear both sides speak.

1672, WALK., 58, p. 58

Cross References

Original Scan

One TALE is good until another be told (heard) - a scanned entry from Tilley's 1950 Dictionary of Proverbs.
Scan courtesy of HathiTrust Digital Library.
Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.

© 2026 TilleyProverbs.com · About

Last updated: January 27, 2026