Meaning & Analysis
It is impossible to physically restrain a woman who is determined to be unfaithful, while it is entirely unnecessary to do so for a woman who is committed to being faithful.
Insights
Primacy of Character
The proverb argues that genuine virtue and loyalty are products of internal character, not external enforcement. It suggests that attempts to impose morality through force or surveillance are destined to fail.
Futility of Coercion
It serves as a commentary on the futility of coercion in relationships. Forcing loyalty is impossible with the unwilling and insulting to the willing, making suspicion and control both ineffective and unnecessary.
Female Agency
The proverb paradoxically highlights female agency. Whether 'dishonest' or 'honest', the woman's own will—not locks or guards—is the ultimate determinant of her actions, subverting external attempts to control her.
Critique of Suspicion
It functions as a critique of jealousy and suspicion, suggesting that such efforts are wasted. If a person is trustworthy, no guards are needed; if they are not, no guards will suffice.
Patriarchal Anxiety
Originating in a patriarchal society, the proverb reflects deep-seated anxieties about female fidelity and the preservation of lineage. It reveals a pragmatic, almost cynical, conclusion that male control through physical confinement is ultimately an illusion.
Gendered Perspective
The proverb is framed entirely from a male perspective, focusing on the 'problem' of managing female virtue. It reveals a cultural bias by positioning women as objects of suspicion whose loyalty must be secured, rather than as autonomous individuals.
Psychological Motivation
The proverb illustrates a timeless psychological principle: behavior is more reliably governed by internal character (intrinsic motivation) than by external threats or constraints (extrinsic motivation). True integrity cannot be coerced or physically enforced.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis and Parallelism
The proverb is built on a perfectly balanced parallel structure, contrasting the 'dishonest woman' with the 'honest one' and the outcome ('cannot be kept in' vs. 'will not') to create a memorable and logically tight argument.
Categorical Language
The use of absolute terms like 'cannot' and 'will not' gives the statement an air of irrefutable, universal truth, framing it as a law of human nature rather than mere observation.
Logical Dilemma
The proverb functions as a concise logical dilemma, presenting two exhaustive and mutually exclusive options that lead to the same conclusion: the act of 'keeping a woman in' is always pointless.
Transcription
Quotations
Be they [women] chast, no golde canne winne them, if immodest no griefe can amende them, so that all mistrust is either needlesse or bootlesse.
(and an honest ought not).
Unto a loose woman, a guard signifies nothing.
For if she be bent to be naught, no Locks will serve turn, and if she be bent to honesty, she can overcome all temptations.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan
Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.