Meaning & Analysis
A person who survives a shipwreck, chooses to go to sea a second time, and is shipwrecked again has no legitimate basis to complain about the sea. The sea's inherent danger was already known from the first disaster, so the fault for the second lies with the individual's poor judgment, not with the sea itself.
Insights
Failure to Learn from Experience
The proverb is a caution against repeating actions that have already proven to be disastrous. The second 'shipwreck' symbolizes any repeated negative outcome, arguing that true folly lies not in the initial mistake, but in the failure to learn from it.
Personal Accountability
It underscores the importance of personal accountability. By blaming the 'sea'—any external circumstance or person whose nature is already known—one avoids taking responsibility for their own decision to re-engage with a known risk.
Risk vs. Recklessness
The proverb distinguishes between calculated risk and foolishness. While a first attempt may be a noble venture, repeating the exact same attempt after a catastrophic failure, without new precautions, is an act of recklessness, not courage.
Misplaced Trust
It serves as a warning against misplaced trust. If a person or situation has already proven to be harmful or unreliable (the first shipwreck), one cannot logically blame them for acting according to their nature a second time. The fault lies in the decision to trust again without justification.
Classical and Maritime Roots
Originating from classical antiquity, as evidenced by the reference to Neptune, the Roman god of the sea, the proverb reflects the wisdom of a maritime culture deeply aware of nature's immutable power. It speaks to a worldview where certain forces are beyond human control, and wisdom lies in managing one's own choices in response to them.
Psychology of Blame
The proverb offers a powerful psychological insight into the human tendency to externalize blame. Rather than confronting the failure of one's own judgment (the decision to repeat a risky action), the individual projects fault onto an external, uncontrollable force (the sea), thus preserving their ego at the cost of wisdom.
Stoic Acceptance and Agency
This proverb embodies a Stoic principle: one should not lament what is beyond one's control (the nature of the sea) but instead focus on one's own reasoned choices and reactions. The 'wrongful' complaint is a failure to accept reality and take responsibility for one's own agency.
Rhetorical Devices
Metaphor
The entire proverb functions as an extended metaphor where the 'sea' represents any known, uncontrollable external risk, and 'shipwreck' symbolizes a catastrophic failure. This allows a specific maritime scenario to convey a universal truth about human judgment.
Implied Narrative
The proverb contains a concise, embedded story—a person experiences a disaster, repeats the cause, and suffers again. This narrative structure makes the abstract moral lesson concrete and highly memorable.
Irony
There is a strong element of situational irony. The complaint is directed at the sea, whose dangerous nature is a constant, rather than at the person's own flawed decision-making, which is the true variable that led to the second disaster.
Transcription
Quotations
Neptunum accusat, qui iterum naufragisi facit. He that hath ones experience, and perilously aduentereth hym selfe agayne, foolysshely than he accuseth Fortune.
They complain wrongfully on the Sea, who twice suffer shipwreck.
(of the sea, who will twice to sea).
To blame Neptune wrongfully, viz. after once being shipwrack'd, still or again to go to Sea.
[As in 1664 Cod.]
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.