Meaning & Analysis
To give something of equal value in return for what one has received, originating from the story of Roland and Oliver, two knights in Charlemagne's court who were so evenly matched that any blow from one could be perfectly countered by the other.
Insights
Equivalent Retaliation
The proverb primarily signifies direct and equivalent retaliation. It means responding to an action, typically an attack or insult, with a counter-action of the same force and nature, essentially 'paying someone back in their own coin'.
A Fair Exchange
Beyond conflict, the phrase can describe any fair and balanced exchange. It represents the principle of 'quid pro quo', where a good deed, a gift, or a clever remark is met with one of equal worth.
A Witty Retort
In debate or conversation, it refers to delivering a comeback or retort that is as clever or cutting as the initial remark. It signifies being well-matched in a battle of wits.
An Evenly Matched Contest
The proverb can describe a situation of competitive stalemate, where two perfectly matched opponents are locked in a struggle, with neither able to gain an advantage over the other.
Literary and Historical Allusion
The proverb is a direct allusion to the heroes of the medieval French epic 'The Song of Roland'. Roland and Oliver were two of Charlemagne's greatest paladins, whose skills in battle were famously equal. This literary origin elevates the phrase beyond simple reciprocity, grounding it in a tradition of chivalry, honor, and evenly matched heroic conflict.
Psychology of Reciprocity
The phrase embodies the powerful psychological principle of reciprocity. It captures the human instinct to respond in kind, whether to a kindness, an insult, or an attack. This drive to 'balance the scales' is a fundamental aspect of social interaction and justice systems, making the proverb a timeless expression of this behavioral norm.
Evolution from Martial to Social Context
While originating from a context of martial prowess, the proverb's usage evolved to encompass verbal sparring and social maneuvering. Citations from the 17th century about 'Liberties of Conversation' show its application to witty retorts and sharp dialogue, illustrating a cultural shift from the battlefield to the drawing-room.
Connotation of Equal Stature
Unlike the more generic 'tit for tat', this proverb carries a sense of nobility and equal stature between the opponents. Giving a 'Rowland for an Oliver' implies a worthy adversary and a duel between equals, not just a petty exchange.
Rhetorical Devices
Allusion
The entire proverb functions as a historical and literary allusion to the 'Song of Roland', with its meaning being inaccessible without knowledge of the two central characters.
Symbolism
The names 'Rowland' and 'Oliver' serve as symbols for any two perfectly matched forces, actions, or individuals, representing the abstract concept of equivalence.
Parallelism
The balanced 'A for B' structure creates a rhetorical parallel that mirrors the theme of an equal exchange, making the phrase rhythmically satisfying and memorable.
Transcription
Quotations
(To haue a)
To haue a Rowlande to resist an Oliuer: he sent solemne Ambassadors to the king of England.
There is hope you shall haue an Oliuer for a Rowland.
A Rowland for an Oliuer.
I will give him a Rowland for his Oliuer, as good as he bringeth.
She will alwayes haue a Rowland for your Oliuer.
*That is, quid pro quo, to be even with one.
Give him tint for tant; as good as he brings; a Rowland for an Oliuer.
'Tis allowable in all the Liberties of Conversation to give a Man a Rowland for his Oliuer, and to pay him in his Own Coin.
I have a Rowland for her Oliuer, and so you may tell her.
Rawland-for-an-Oliver, to give as good as he brought.
She that accuses her Neighbour, might her self be accused of it in her turn, pursuant to the ancient and righteous Law of returning a Rowland for an Oliver.
There is a Rowland for your Oliuer.
Cross References
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.