Meaning & Analysis
If you do not intend to steal my kale (cabbage or broth), then do not damage the protective wall (dike) around my garden. It warns against committing a lesser transgression that suggests a more serious one is intended.
Insights
Avoiding the Appearance of Evil
The proverb is a warning to avoid actions that, while not explicitly harmful, create suspicion or give the appearance of malicious intent. Breaking the dike is a suspicious act that naturally leads one to assume the worst.
Respect for Boundaries
The 'dike' symbolizes personal, social, or ethical boundaries. The proverb argues that one should not even test or tamper with these boundaries, as such an act is a violation in itself and erodes trust, regardless of the ultimate outcome.
Preventing Escalation
It illustrates the idea that seemingly minor offenses are often gateways to more significant transgressions. By cautioning against breaking the dike, the proverb advises nipping harmful behavior in the bud before it escalates.
Integrity and Trust
The proverb highlights that trust is maintained not only by refraining from causing direct harm but also by acting in a way that is transparent and non-threatening. Damaging the dike is a breach of trust, implying hostile intentions.
Agrarian and Social Order
Rooted in an agrarian context, the 'dike' (a protective wall or fence) and 'kale' (a staple crop) ground the proverb in the tangible realities of rural life, where protecting one's livelihood was paramount. The proverb reflects the practical wisdom that preparatory acts of mischief are as threatening as the final deed.
Psychology of Suspicion
The proverb has a strong psychological dimension, highlighting the anxiety and distrust sown by ambiguous or threatening actions. Breaking the dike, even without theft, violates a social contract and forces the owner to assume malicious intent, demonstrating that the appearance of wrongdoing can be as socially corrosive as the act itself.
Ethical and Legal Parallel
This proverb serves as a folk-law principle, akin to modern legal concepts of 'attempt' or 'breaking and entering.' It argues that violating a protective boundary is an offense in itself, because it signals a disregard for ownership and social norms, regardless of whether a greater crime is completed.
Cross-Cultural Wisdom
The sentiment is explicitly linked in the 1721 quotation to the English proverb, 'He that would no Evil do, Must do nought that's like thereto.' This connection underscores a shared cultural understanding across Britain that avoiding even the appearance of wrongdoing is essential for maintaining social trust.
Rhetorical Devices
Conditional Clause
The proverb uses a conditional 'if-then' structure ('If you do X, do not do Y') to create a clear, logical, and didactic command.
Symbolism
The 'kale' symbolizes any valued possession or person, while the 'dike' symbolizes the protective measures, rules, or personal boundaries that safeguard it. This allows the proverb to be applied universally.
Parallelism
The balanced structure of the two negative commands ('steal not... break not') creates a memorable rhythm and reinforces the connection between the two actions.
Direct Address
The use of 'thou' and the imperative mood creates a direct, personal, and forceful tone, making the advice feel like a stern, personal warning.
Transcription
Quotations
(If he steal not my kail)
If you be not ill, be not ill like; If you steal not my Kail, break not my Dike. *Eng. He that would no Evil do, Must do nought that's like thereto.
Cross References
Annotations
- broth
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.