Meaning & Analysis
A person who tries to chase two hares at once will fail to catch either; divided pursuit spoils the result.
Insights
Focus over Multitasking
Warns that splitting attention across parallel goals undermines performance; concentration on a single objective yields better outcomes than juggling several at once.
Strategic Commitment
Urges decisive choice among competing opportunities; real progress requires picking a target and accepting the cost of foregoing others.
Opportunity Cost
Highlights that every chase consumes time and energy; dividing effort doubles the cost without doubling the gain, often producing net loss.
Integrity of Purpose
Suggests that wavering loyalties or mixed motives sabotage action; clarity of purpose binds will and resources into effective force.
Timing and Coordination
Implies that the choreography needed to catch even one agile target is intricate; adding a second desynchronizes tactics and collapses execution.
Classical Pedigree
The Latin tag—‘Duos insequens lepores, neutrum capit’—travels via Erasmus into European proverb lore, preserving a field lesson as a general rule of prudence.
Fieldcraft Logic
Coursing a hare requires reading ground, wind, and turns; two hares run divergent lines, ensuring that any hound (or hunter) who wavers will lose both lines at once.
Cognitive Costs
Modern psychology confirms heavy ‘task-switching’ penalties: context shifts reset working memory and degrade accuracy, mirroring the proverb’s practical wisdom.
Work-in-Process Limits
Project disciplines from craft shops to software stress limiting concurrent work; throughput rises when teams pursue fewer items to completion—folk foresight anticipating lean thinking.
Moral Psychology
The fear of missing out tempts us to hedge; the saying counters by reframing renunciation as strength—choosing one good to avoid losing all.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
Sets ‘two hares’ against ‘loses both,’ a crisp opposition that dramatizes how abundance of aims breeds scarcity of results.
Parallelism
Balanced clause structure (‘hunts two hares / loses both’) gives the line mnemonic symmetry and the feel of an axiom.
Hyperbole (Measured)
Though not literally universal, the sweeping claim heightens caution, making the counsel stick in memory.
Metaphor/Allegory
Transposes hunting into the realm of decision-making; the chase pictures the mind’s pursuit of goals.
Alliteration
The h-initial in ‘hunts’ and ‘hares’ provides a soft sonic hook that aids recall.
Transcription
Quotations
Duos insequens lepores, neutrum capit.
(looseth one, and leaueth the other).
Who hunteth two hares, loseth the one, and leaueth the other.
Yet one thing maketh [me] to feare, that in running after two Hares, I catch neither.
(two Hares at once, shall sometime lose one, and sometime both: shall goe without both).
Who hunts two Hares at one time, catches none.
The Hound that followes two Hares, will catch neither.
(oft loseth both).
He would engage his service to my niece: I shall not think him worthy, if he have Two hares afoot.
I shall be loth to hunt two hares, and after lose them both.
Keep to your debate. You have two hares a-foot. You will lose both.
Who traceth two hares at once, taketh not the one, and letteth the other go.
He who hunts two Hares, he sometimes takes one, and sometimes none.
Who hunts two Hares loseth the one and deserts the other.
Who hunts two hares, the one he doth not take, the other he letteth go.
If you run after two Hares, you will catch neither.
He that pursues two hares at once, does not catch one and let[s] t'other go.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.