Meaning & Analysis
No law, no matter how authoritative or forcefully enacted, can change people’s character or make them truly honest.
Insights
Limits of Legislation
Asserts that external laws or decrees are powerless to instill genuine virtue or integrity in individuals; true morality arises from within, not from legal compulsion.
Distinction Between Law and Morality
Emphasizes the gap between legal obedience and moral rectitude, warning that legality does not equate to ethical character.
Skepticism Toward Reform by Edict
Warns against the belief that society’s deeper problems—like dishonesty—can be fixed solely through official proclamations or bureaucratic measures.
Political Satire
Originating in a period of expanding legislative authority (and immortalized by Ben Jonson), the proverb lampoons the pretensions of government, poking fun at the notion that character can be engineered by statute.
Universal Principle
Variants of this proverb exist in many cultures and eras, reflecting the enduring wisdom that laws can shape actions but not hearts—a recurrent theme in legal philosophy and social ethics.
Moral Autonomy
Invokes the philosophical idea that genuine morality is a matter of conscience and inner discipline, not simply compliance with external rules.
Rhetorical Devices
Hyperbole
Exaggerates Parliament’s inability to alter character, making the point more vivid and memorable through strong assertion.
Irony
Uses ironic contrast between the grand authority of Parliament and its impotence in matters of private virtue.
Legal Allusion
References the formal language of law ('act of Parliament'), giving the proverb weight and a wry, bureaucratic flavor.
Transcription
Quotations
This act may make him honest! —If he were To be made honest, by an act of Parliament, I should not alter, i' my faith of him.
Cross References
- See SM., p. 601.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.