Meaning & Analysis
The proverb posits that there are two distinct categories of poor people: those whose poverty is due to unavoidable circumstances or God's will, and those whose poverty is the result of their own vices and moral failures.
Insights
Moral Judgment of Poverty
The proverb serves as a moral framework for judging the impoverished, separating them into the 'deserving' and the 'undeserving.' This justifies offering charity to the former while condemning or withholding it from the latter.
Justification of Social Hierarchy
By attributing poverty to individual sin, the proverb implicitly defends the existing social order. It suggests that wealth may be a sign of virtue, while poverty is often a consequence of vice, thereby justifying social inequality.
A Guide for Discerning Charity
It functions as a cautionary principle for charitable giving, advising discernment. True piety, it suggests, involves helping those afflicted by providence, not enabling those who have brought ruin upon themselves through dissolute living.
Historical Social Welfare
This proverb provides a theological justification for social stratification, reflecting historical Poor Law distinctions between the 'deserving' poor (widows, orphans, disabled) and the 'undeserving' or 'sturdy beggars' (able-bodied but unemployed), who were often punished rather than aided.
Theological Judgment
The proverb is rooted in a worldview that interprets worldly conditions as indicators of divine favor or moral failing. It distinguishes between suffering as a divine test ('God's poor') and as a direct consequence of sin ('the devil's poor').
Enduring Political Relevance
This dichotomy persists in modern debates about social welfare, where arguments frequently distinguish between poverty caused by systemic issues or misfortune and poverty attributed to individual choices, laziness, or vice.
Psychology of Blame
The proverb reveals a psychological tendency to create moral distance from suffering by blaming the victim. Categorizing some poor as 'undeserving' alleviates the social and moral obligation to provide universal help.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb is built on the stark contrast between 'God' and the 'devil', creating a powerful moral and theological opposition that frames poverty in absolute terms.
Parallelism
The balanced, repetitive structure of 'God's poor' and 'the devil's poor' makes the saying rhythmic, memorable, and easily digestible as a piece of folk wisdom.
Symbolism
'God' and the 'devil' are used as potent symbols for virtue/providence and vice/corruption, immediately investing the statement with profound moral and religious weight.
Transcription
Quotations
There are Gods poore, and the Deuils poore: those the hand of God hath crossed; these haue forced necessitie on themselues by a dissolute life.
There is God's Poor and the Devil's Poor; the first from Providence, the other from Vice.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.