Meaning & Analysis
Claims that friars never loved or desired what was genuinely good, implying their preferences or affections are always misaligned with virtue.
Insights
Contradiction of Profession
Highlights the ironic notion that those who profess moral superiority or spiritual authority may secretly scorn true goodness, instead favoring self-interest or vice.
Disillusionment with Authority
Represents a broader skepticism or cynicism towards religious or moral leaders, suggesting they are disconnected from the very virtues they espouse.
Historical Symbolism
During the Reformation and in early modern England, friars and monks became stock figures of satire and anti-clerical sentiment. This proverb reflects a cultural tendency to suspect clergy of hypocrisy and to associate them with corruption or worldliness rather than piety.
Literary and Cultural Resonance
The phrase is echoed in works by Jonson and Davies, embedding the suspicion of clerical motives in English literary tradition. The implication that the friar shuns ‘what was good’ became a common satirical trope across genres.
Psychological Dimensions
Expresses the psychological disappointment and betrayal felt when figures of trust or virtue are found to lack genuine alignment with the values they represent, fostering public cynicism and alienation.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
Sets 'what was good' against the friar’s affections, sharpening the sense of contradiction between profession and practice.
Ellipsis/Inversion
The proverb’s inverted syntax and elliptical form compress its meaning, lending a tone of irony and universal assertion.
Transcription
Quotations
There was a time (to speak whereof I faint Sith That that was, nere lou'd the ducking Frir'e).
That which was good, never loved the frier.
What should have beene, that never lov'd the Friar.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan
Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.