Meaning & Analysis
One should not perform a morally wrong (evil) action, even with the intention or hope that a positive (good) result will emerge from it.
Insights
The Primacy of Means
The proverb establishes a clear ethical hierarchy where the morality of the means takes precedence over the desirability of the ends. It argues that a noble goal cannot purify a corrupt method.
Corruption of Character
It suggests that committing an evil act, regardless of the motive, inevitably corrupts the actor and compromises their moral integrity. The very act of doing wrong inflicts its own kind of damage.
The Slippery Slope
The proverb serves as a warning about the slippery slope of moral compromise. Justifying one 'small' evil for a 'greater' good can set a precedent that leads to escalating transgressions.
Unintended Consequences
It implies that evil actions unleash unpredictable consequences. While the intended 'good' is often speculative, the harm caused by the 'evil' act is real and may lead to unforeseen negative outcomes that outweigh any potential benefit.
Ethical Framework
This proverb directly opposes consequentialist ethical frameworks, such as the principle that 'the end justifies the means'. It aligns with deontological ethics, which assert that certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong, irrespective of their outcomes.
Theological Roots
The proverb's authority in Western culture is significantly reinforced by its biblical origins, particularly in the Pauline epistles (Romans 3:8). This frames it not merely as folk wisdom but as a foundational moral law.
Political and Literary Resonance
The principle is a recurring theme in political philosophy and literature, including Shakespeare's 'Richard II'. It questions the legitimacy of using immoral methods to achieve supposedly righteous political goals, a debate that remains central to modern governance.
Psychology of Rationalization
Psychologically, the proverb serves as a powerful check against rationalization—the human tendency to justify unethical behavior by focusing on a desirable outcome. It forces an uncompromising look at the morality of one's actions.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb is built on the stark conceptual contrast between 'evil' and 'good', creating a powerful, memorable, and clear moral opposition.
Categorical Assertion
The use of 'Never' makes the proverb an absolute moral command, leaving no room for situational exceptions and strengthening its didactic force.
Imperative Mood
Phrased as a direct command ('Never do...'), the proverb adopts an imperative and authoritative tone, presenting itself as an undeniable moral law rather than a piece of advice.
Transcription
Quotations
(We must not doo euil, that).
The Spirite of trueth teacheth vs that it is not lawfull for vs to doe evill, that good may come thereof.
And this I find —Quod non sunt facienda mala, vt veniant bona. For good; (how great soeuer) must be don, No ill how small soeuer.
We must never doe the least evill, that we may obtaine the greatest good.
There neuer comes any ill, but it comes with a good intent.
And Chreicton . . avouched . . That evill was not to be done that Good might come of it.
Bible Citations
And not . . Let us do evil, that good may come.
Shakespeare Citations
To find out right with wrong—it may not be.
Cross References
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.