Meaning & Analysis
Engaging in negative, immoral, or harmful conversations (evil communications) leads to the erosion of one's good behavior and moral character.
Insights
Moral Contagion
The proverb serves as a metaphor for the contagious nature of ideas and behaviors. It suggests that morality is not fixed but is highly susceptible to the social environment, spreading like a contagion from person to person.
Environmental Influence
It illustrates the formative power of our surroundings. 'Evil communications' represent a toxic environment that can poison and degrade an individual's character, emphasizing that virtue requires a healthy social ecosystem to thrive.
The Power of Language
The proverb highlights the potent and active role of language in shaping reality. Words are not merely descriptive; they are formative, possessing the power to actively build or destroy moral foundations.
Gradual Corruption
It speaks to the idea that exposure to vice gradually desensitizes and normalizes it. What initially seems 'evil' can, through repeated communication, become familiar and accepted, leading to a slow decay of 'good manners'.
Biblical Authority
Originating from the Bible (1 Corinthians 15:33), the proverb carries significant moral and religious authority, traditionally used to warn against associating with heretics or non-believers whose speech could undermine faith and virtue.
Psychological Contagion
The proverb reflects the psychological principle of social contagion, where attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors spread through social networks. It underscores the powerful human tendency to conform to group norms, even when those norms are negative.
Contemporary Relevance
In a modern context, 'communications' extends beyond speech to social media, news, and online content. The proverb serves as a timeless caution against the corrupting influence of misinformation, toxic discourse, and echo chambers in the digital age.
Cultural Gatekeeping
The proverb highlights a cultural anxiety about external influence and the perceived fragility of virtue. It has historically been invoked to justify social control, censorship, and the careful policing of social boundaries to preserve moral order.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb creates a stark moral contrast between the cause ('evil communications') and the effect ('good manners'), making its warning clear and impactful.
Active Verb Choice
The verb 'corrupt' gives active, almost malevolent agency to 'communications', portraying words as a powerful, dynamic force capable of causing moral decay.
Didactic Tone
The proverb's structure is direct, declarative, and instructional, framing it as an undeniable moral law rather than a mere observation. This authoritative tone enhances its cautionary power.
Transcription
Quotations
(Foule wordes).
For (as saynt Paule speaketh of such heresies) euill communicacion corrupteth good manners.
Corrumpunt mores bonos colloquia praua. Naughtye communications spyl good maners.
(Ill words corrupts).
(Evill speeches).
As by good words euill manners are corrected, so by euill words are good ones corrupted.
(Ugly discourse corrupts).
(words).
(corrupts)
Bible Citations
Cross References
- See DÜR., I, no. 584.
Annotations
- This prouerbe declareth, that commonly we proue suche as they be with whome we be conuersaunt.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.