Meaning & Analysis
A person who lacks a sense of shame will not be able to gain a good reputation or be considered trustworthy by others. The word 'wants' is used in its archaic sense, meaning 'lacks'.
Insights
Reputation and Social Contract
Shame acts as an internal enforcement mechanism for the unwritten rules of society. Lacking it implies a willingness to violate those rules for personal gain, inevitably destroying the social trust ('credit') that allows a community to function.
Integrity and Trustworthiness
The proverb frames integrity as a prerequisite for credibility. A person incapable of feeling shame for their misdeeds is seen as fundamentally unreliable, making them a poor risk in any social, professional, or financial relationship.
The Paradox of Vulnerability
It suggests that the painful, vulnerable emotion of shame is paradoxically a sign of strength and good character. The ability to feel shame demonstrates self-awareness and respect for social standards, which in turn earns respect and trust from others.
Historical Context of Honor
In the early 17th century, 'credit' was not merely financial but encompassed one's entire reputation, honor, and social standing. The proverb reflects a society where personal integrity was the bedrock of all social and economic transactions, and a shameless person was considered a dangerous outlier.
Psychological Truth
The proverb captures a profound psychological insight: shame functions as a critical social emotion that regulates behavior. Its absence, or 'shamelessness,' signals a disregard for social norms and the feelings of others, which is instinctively perceived as untrustworthy.
Moral Foundation of Reputation
This proverb serves as a moral axiom, arguing that a good reputation ('credit') is not something that can be achieved through superficial acts alone; it must be rooted in an internal moral compass, of which the capacity to feel shame is a primary indicator.
Rhetorical Devices
Cause and Effect Structure
The proverb sets up a direct causal link between an internal state (lacking shame) and an external consequence (not winning credit), creating a powerful and memorable moral equation.
Antithesis
An implicit contrast is drawn between the negative quality of 'wanting shame' and the positive achievement of 'winning credit', highlighting the moral stakes of one's character.
Semantic Ambiguity
The proverb uses 'wants' in its older meaning of 'lacks' and 'credit' to mean both reputation and financial trust, adding layers of meaning that enrich its interpretation.
Transcription
Quotations
(never win credit)
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.