Meaning & Analysis
If a person pays a bribe or a fee to obtain a judicial position (a magistracy), they will inevitably have to accept bribes and pervert the law to recover their initial expenditure.
Insights
The Cycle of Corruption
The proverb illustrates that an initial corrupt act inevitably creates a cycle of further corruption. To justify or profit from the first transgression (buying the office), one is forced into subsequent, continuous transgressions (selling justice).
Commodification of Power
It serves as a broader warning that when positions of power or trust are treated as commodities to be bought, their intrinsic duties and moral responsibilities are also debased into commodities to be sold.
Integrity vs. Transaction
The proverb argues that integrity is incompatible with financial transaction. The moment a price is put on a position of public trust, the moral authority required to hold that position is nullified.
The Inevitability of Consequence
The use of the word 'must' implies an unavoidable consequence. It suggests a deterministic view of corruption, where the initial compromise of buying one's way into power makes the subsequent betrayal of that power a logical necessity.
Historical Venality
This proverb reflects the historical practice of venality, where public offices were sold to the highest bidder, a common fundraising method for early modern states. The saying captures the widespread understanding that this system institutionalized corruption, as the officeholder would inevitably need to exploit their position to recoup their initial investment.
The Economics of Corruption
The proverb frames corruption as a perverse business model. As Thomas Fuller's 1642 quotation vividly puts it, 'They that buy Justice by wholesale... must sell it by retail.' This economic language demystifies corruption, presenting it not just as a moral failure but as a predictable financial outcome of commodifying power.
Psychological Rationalization
The proverb reveals the psychological rationalization of a corrupt official. The initial purchase creates a sense of entitlement, twisting the logic of public service into a commercial enterprise. The 1549 quotation, 'He may lawfully sell it, he bought it before,' perfectly illustrates this self-justifying mindset.
Modern Political Relevance
While rooted in historical practices, the proverb remains highly relevant. It serves as a powerful allegory for the influence of money in modern politics, where costly election campaigns can create obligations to donors, leading to a system where political influence is effectively sold.
Rhetorical Devices
Antithesis
The proverb is built on the direct opposition between 'buys' and 'sells', and the conceptual contrast between 'magistracy' (public trust) and 'justice' (moral duty). This creates a powerful and memorable statement about cause and effect.
Metaphor
The phrase 'sell justice' is a potent metaphor that reframes a sacred civic duty as a common, marketable good, highlighting the degrading nature of the corruption.
Parallelism
The proverb's balanced, parallel structure ('He that buys X must sell Y') makes its logic feel direct, inescapable, and easy to recall.
Transcription
Quotations
Are civil offices bought for money? . . If they buy, they must needs sell; for it is wittily spoken, Vendere jure potest, emerat ille prius, He may lawfully sell it, he bought it before.
They that buy Justice by wholesale, to make themselves savers must sell it by retail.
For they that buy the office, will sell the act.
Who buys a magistracy must upon force sell Justice.
Related Proverbs
Original Scan

Used under CC BY-NC 3.0.